All the Pretty Colors French Adjectives of Color

The French have long been in love with color, and they have many names for pure and nuanced color. Here are some of the most common French colors, plus color variations and other extras for anyone who loves color as much as the French do. There are, of course, many more French colors than we have listed here, especially in French fashion  and in French beauty products like makeup and hair color. But this will give you a taste of French colors and the rules that govern their usage. Lets start at the beginning with la  couleur,  which  is a feminine noun, as in les couleurs primaires (primary colors) and les couleurs complà ©mentaires (complementary colors). The colors themselves are adjectives describing something, such as une jolie couleur verte (a pretty shade of green). The Rules of Color Agreement Some colors (remember, theyre adjectives) agree with the noun they modify; others dont. According to the rules of color agreement, colors based on the names of fruit, flowers, precious stones, metals, and other elements of nature are invariable (invariable, do not change form), as are compound colors consisting of  two or more  colors (a blue green chair) or a color with an adjective of intensity (a dark blue chair). The remaining French colors agree with the nouns that they modify. Exceptions:  pourpre and violet (purple), mauve (mauve), rose (pink), eÃŒ carlate (scarlet red), fauve (fawn),  and incarnat (crimson red), which do agree with the number and gender of the noun they modify. When in doubt, check a French dictionary, which will show both masculine and feminine forms of any color that changes in agreement with its noun or it will say adjectif invariable  for any color that does not change, i.e., is invariable. A Few Colors (Couleurs) Abricot   apricotAmbre    amber (dark orange yellow)Argentà ©Ã‚  Ã‚  silver  Avocat   avocadoBeige beigeBlanc or blanche   white;  Ãƒ ©cru   off-white;  cà ©ruse   old white;  coquille doeuf   white with a touch of pinkish tan, like an egg;  crà ¨me   cream;  blanc dEspagne   Spanish white, slightly cream;  blanc cassà ©Ã‚   broken white between crà ¨me and bisBleu blue;  bleu ardoise slate blue;  bleu canard peacock blue;  bleu ciel   sky blue; bleu marine navy blue;  bleu nuit midnight blue;  bleu outremer ultramarineBrun brown, dark;  brun cuivrà ©Ã‚  Ã‚  tawny;  brun roux   auburnChocolat   chocolate brownDorà © golden,  golden brown, the color of giltFauve fawn (taupe, light grayish brown)Gris gray;  fumà ©e smoke; cendre ash;  bis soft greyJaune   yellow;  jaune citron   lemon yellow;  jaune coing   [bright] quince yellow;  jaune dor   golden yellow;  jaune moutarde   mustard yello w;  jaune paille   straw yellow;  jaune  canari   canary yellow;  jaune poussin   chick yellow, bright yellowMarron  (horse chestnut)   brown;  marron glacà © light chestnut brown; cafà © au lait light brownMauve   mauveMulticolore   multicoloredNoir black;  Ãƒ ©bà ¨ne ebonyOrange   orange  Pourpre purpleRose   pinkRouge red;  eÃŒ carlate   scarlet;  incarnat   crimson  Transparent transparentTurquoise   turquoiseVert green; vert citron lime green; vert sapin pine  green, forest green;  vert prà © / vert gazon grass green; olive / pistache / à ©meraude olive / pistachio / emerald; vert pomme / deau / bouteille apple / sea / bottle greenViolet  or  violette   violet Invariables: Colors Based on Elements of Nature Color adjectives based on elements of nature such as the names of flowers, fruits, precious and other stones, or metals are generally invariable, meaning they do not agree with the noun they modify and, therefore, do not change form. Many are compound adjectives such as jaune citron, which also makes them invariable; take away the main color such as jaune and leave only the modifier from nature such as citron, and you still have an invariable, unchanging adjective. Some common colors that derive their names from fruits, stones, metals, flowers and other elements of nature  include: Abricot   apricotAmbre  Ã‚   amber (dark orange yellow)Avocat   avocadoBleu ardoise   slate blue;  bleu canard   peacock blueBrique   brick redBronze   bronzeChocolat chocolate brownÉbà ¨ne   ebony (black)Fuschia   fuschiaJaune citron   lemon yellow; jaune coing quince yellow, bright yellow;  jaune dor   golden yellow;  jaune moutarde   mustard yellow;  jaune paille   straw yellow;  jaune canari   canary yellow;  jaune poussin   chick yellow, bright yellowLavande   lavenderMarron  (horse chestnut) brown;  marron glacà ©Ã‚   light chestnut brown;  cafà © au lait   light brownNoisette   hazelnutOrange   orangeTurquoise   turquoiseVert citron lime green;  vert sapin   pine green, forest green;  vert prà © / vert gazon   grass green; olive / pistache / à ©meraude   olive / pistachio / emerald; vert pomme / deau / bouteille   apple / sea / bottle green Because these are invariable (do not agree in gender and number), you would say: Des cravates orange orange ties (not oranges)Des yeux marron brown eyes (not marrons)Des yeux noisette hazel eyes (not noisettes)Des fleurs fuschia   fuschia-colored flowers (not fuschia/e/s)Des chaussures citron  Ã‚  lemon yellow shoes (not citron/e/s)Des   pantalons cerise cherry red pants (not cerises) Exceptions:  pourpre and violet (purple), mauve (mauve), rose (pink), eÃŒ carlate (scarlet red), fauve (fawn), and  incarnat (crimson red), which agree with the number and gender of the noun they modify. For example: Des chaussures fauves taupe shoes More Invariables: Compound Colors When a color consists of two or more colors or a color and an adjective of intensity, then the color adjectives are invariable, meaning they do not agree in number and gender with the noun they describe. Une chemise bleu vert (not bleue verte)Des yeux gris bleu (not gris bleus)Une robe vert paÌ‚le (not verte paÌ‚le) And More Invariables: Adjectives of  Intensity Color Adjectives describing the nuances or degrees of intensity often  modify colors. Together, they form a compound color such as  rose clair  (light pink)  that is invariable. Such adjectives of intensity include: Clair   lightFonceÃŒ    darkVif   brightPaÌ‚le   pale

Book Report For The Book the Secret Life Of Bees By Sue /Review

Essays on The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd Book Report/Review The paper "The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd" is a great example of a book review on biology. The title of Sue Monk Kidd’s book, The Secret Life of Bees, represents Lily, who is the central character. She lives a secret life that others are not able to understand just like the bees. Her soul and spirit are like the bee-hive to her. Others have no clue how she is complex. Lily is not like a typical one-parent child. She is irreplaceable, despite the fact that she does not understand her life. The start of each chapter of Kidd’s book has a quote from other sources about bees, which the writer personifies in the book. The beginning of chapter one has a quote stating that if a queen is out of her hive, there arise immediate indications of the lack of a queen. The chapter talks about the growth of Lily (Morrison’s, The Sacred Feminine). She grows up without a mother and shows clear signs of lack of a mother. Chapter eight has a quote stating that if one takes a bee away from its sisters, it dies after a short time. It talks about May, who in August and June’s sister, and her unique sense of empathy. She lost her twin sister, April, and since then she always wanted to die every time she sees a sign of death or anger. Personification stands out clearly throughout the book (Morrison’s, The Sacred Feminine). Bee-hives represent a symbolic parallel to the community that August has made in the pink house. Bees live, work and produce honey in bee-hives. F emale bees in August’s community dominate the bee-hive and the queen bee rules over everything. The queen bee becomes the mother of the other bees (Morrison’s, The Sacred Feminine). It is symbolic when August says the Virgin Mary is the mother of all women close to her. August refers to them as the Daughters of Mary. In conclusion, Kidd’s book reflects the life and life of bees in a bee-hive. The title, The Secret Life of Bees, is the most relevant and suitable title for the book.

A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moores Utopia and Essay Example For Students

A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moores Utopia and Essay Machiavelli?s The PrinceJust vs. ViableTo be just is to be fair and honorable. Kids are taught that if you are kind and just you will excel and be successful. But lifes not fair and being just doesnt necessary mean that a society will stand the test of time and be able to grow. The two different societies introduced in Mores Utopia and Machiavellis The Prince are very different and although Mores Utopian society would be considered more just then Machiavellis society. Machiavellis society is more realistic and more likely to be viable. Leadership is a major issue when it comes to whether or not a society is going to be viable. It seems that if the leader is a good leader, a leader that puts his people first and wants the best for his country, then the land and the society should flourish. But if the leader is a bad leader, a power driven leader, a leader who puts himself first, and lets his people starve while he and his nobles live in excess, then the society and land will not flour ish. This idea is not demonstrated to us in Utopia or The Prince; it seems like the exact opposite. Utopia has a more democratic government. Each set of households elects someone and then those elects elect others, and although there is a prince they still have the power to throw him out of office if hes involved in any wrong doing. And although their prince doesnt have as much power as a prince in Machiavellis writing the prince in Utopia serves a different purpose. The prince in Utopia is there to provide stability. With the syphogrants and tranibors changing annually the stability of a constant figure head is needed. More describes the government as followsOnce a year, every group of thirty households elects an official,Formerly called the syphogrant, but now called the phylarch. OverEvery group of ten syphogrants with their households there is another official, once called the tranibor but now known as the head phylarch. All the syphogrants, two hundred in number, are brought to gether to elect the prince. They take an oath to choose the man they think best qualified; and then by secret ballot they elect they prince from among four men nominated by the people of the four sections of the city. The prince holds office for life, unless he is suspected of aiming at a tyranny. Though the tranibors are elected annually they are not changed for light or casual reasons. All other officials hold office for a single year only. Any one can be a syphogrant or tranibor. And once you have a chance to be one you can not be re-elected. This prevents the same people from always being in office. And although you can campaign for office it is looked down upon. They believe the if you want the office that much you must have ulterior motives fueling you, so you wont be elected. They also had a rules whose purpose was to prevent the prince and the tranibors from conspiring together to alter the government and enslave the people. Although the Utopians are free, they dont exercis e their freedom and they have slaves. The slaves are people captured from other nations that dont have Utopian ideals and Utopians that have committed a crime. More also says thatSlaves, moreover, are permanent and visible reminder that crime doesnot pay. If the slaves rebel against their condition, then, like savage beastwhich neither bars nor chains can tame, they put instantly to death. But ifthey are patient, they are not left altogether without hope. When subduedby long hardships, if they show by their behavior that they regret the crimemore than the punishment, their slavery is lightened or remittedaltogether, sometimes by the princes pardon, sometimes by popular vote. Also all the Utopians think the same. This is the main reason why their society wouldnt be viable although it is more just. The fact that they dont value money and no one pays for anything, everyone just takes what they need, makes the Utopian society more just because everything seems fair. But its unrealistic, its not human nature. The Utopians as a society are very self centered, so its hard to believe that they would be such honest people. And the fact that they dont fight their own wars and they dont abide by any rules of war, they win by any means even if it means fighting dirty. The Utopians put on a front of having these great morals and being a great society, but its all smoke and mirrors. They make themselves look like a wonderful society. But they are the lesser of two evils, they are more just then the society in The Prince, although they arent as viable. .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 , .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .postImageUrl , .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 , .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285:hover , .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285:visited , .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285:active { border:0!important; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285:active , .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285 .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7bf5992e18ab5ba7d914d3077aa5f285:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: My First Concert Essay The government in The Prince is a monarchy, with a distinctive cast system. Machiavelli said that the best way to keep order in this kind of society was for the people to fear their leader but not to hate him because the prince must have the people well disposed toward him; otherwise in times of adversity there is no hope. The prince had to keep the people, the nobles and the army all happy at the same time. The people were kept happy to keep them from bringing in an outside force and also for the fact that a man who conspires against a popular prince must also be fearful after his crime is committed since then he will have the whole people against him, and from there hate he can hope no refuge whatever. But the people arent too hard to please because most of the time they dont care who is ruling over them as long as they are left alone. The nobles and advisers had to be kept happy so they would continue to be loyal to him. Machiavelli says the following about how the relationship between the prince and the advisers and nobles should beThe man who holds a princes kingdom in his hand should not even beaware of anything but his masters business. And on the other hand, the prince who wants to keep his minister obedient should think of his welfare,honor him, enrich him, load him with distinctions and offices. Thus theminister will not be able to stand without the prince, the many honors willkeep him from looking elsewhere for more honor, the many riches will keep him for thinking of more riches, and the many offices will give himreason to fear changes. When the prince and the his minister stand onthese terms, they can have complete confidence in one another; whenthings are otherwise, they always turn out badly, either for one or theother. The army had to be kept happy so he could maintain control over their troops. The troops were the most powerful of the three groups. So if all three could not be kept happy, they were satisfied first,and when they cannot escape some hatred, they should try as hard as they can to avoid the hatred of the most powerful group around. Thusemporers who were new in office and needed special support turned to thesoldiers rather than the people The people in this society werent free. But they didnt seem to mind as long as they could go on with there everyday life without being bothered. Even though they were a far from perfect society they learned that it was best to fight their own wars. They didnt try and cover up their faults. And although a prince was expected to appear virtuous he was not necessarily suppose to be virtuous. But this society was in no way more just then the Utopian society, although this society was more viable. They had what it took to last, to grow and to flourish. Both societies have there good points and both societies have their flaws. More imagined a new society, even though it still carried some remnants of the one he knew. And the Utopian society looked great on paper; they were very just and honorable people. But when examined in depth it falls apart. This society wouldnt last people dont think that way. Machiavelli criticized and critiqued history, he took things he knew and said how they could be made better for future societies. Except societies and societal ideas evolve, ideas that worked then dont always work now. His society was based on backstabbing and deceitfulness, appearing virtuous but not actually being virtuous. So although his society would have lasted, it was far from just. But this is the opinion looking back at these texts. When these texts were written More and Machiavelli both thought these were the ideal societies. But if More and Machiavelli knew what people know now would their societal ideas still be what they were?

Marcus Brutus Essays (882 words) - , Term Papers

Marcus Brutus Marcus Brutus William Shakespeare's play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, is mainly based on the assassination of Julius Caesar. The character who was in charge of the assassination was, ironically, Marcus Brutus, a servant and close friend to Julius Caesar. (http://classics.mit.edu/Plutarch/m_brutus.sum.html) But what would cause a person to kill a close friend? After examining Brutus' relationship to Caesar, his involvement in the conspiracy, and his importance to the plot, the truth can be revealed. Marcus Brutus, a servant and close friend to Caesar, has a strong relationship with Caesar but a stronger relationship with Rome and its people. Brutus is very close to Caesar. In many points of the play, Brutus was talking and next to Caesar. Brutus also loves Caesar but fears his power. In the early acts of the play, Brutus says to Cassius, What means this shouting? I do fear the people do choose Caesar for their king...yet I love him well.(Shakesspeare, act 1, scene 2,85-89), as he is speaking to Cassius. Brutus loves Caesar, but would not allow him to climber-upward...He then unto the ladder turns his back...(act 2, scene 1, 24,26). As the quote says, Fite 2 Brutus would not allow Caesar to rise to power and then turn his back onto the people of Rome.Brutus had honored Caesar but Brutus felt that Caesar was to ambitious. Brutus also felt that Caesar made the romans as slaves. Therefore, Brutus is an honorable man. Brutus is a noble man who was revered by many. Brutus had joined the conspiracy because he had the desire to help the commoners. He was a follower of idealism, where the romans would possess peace, liberty and freedom. Brutus wanted the kill Caesar, because he believed that all of the people of Rome would eventually be slaves, thus Brutus resorted to the assassination ofCaesar.(Ferguson 145) After the assassination of Julius Caesar, Brutus talks to Antony about Caesar's death. Our hearts you see not; they are pitiful; and pity to the general wrong of Rome...(Shakesspeare, act 3, scene 1, 185-186). Brutus says that Antony cannot see the members of the conspiracys hearts, which are full of pity. Again, this shows how Brutus loved Caesar but cared for the life of Rome and its people more. This is the only reason Brutus would conspire against Caesar. For Brutus says to himself, I know no personal cause to spurn at him...How that might change his nature...(Shakespeare, act 2, scene1, 1,13) Caesar's relationship with Brutus is also strong. Just allowing Brutus to speak to Caesar shows his respect for Brutus. Caesar feels that Brutus is noble to him and does the right thing regardless of personal danger. On the Ides of March, Fite 3 as Caesar was assassinated, Caesar's last line is: Et tu, Brute?--Then fall, Caesar.(Shakespeare, act 3, scene 1, 85). This shows that Caesar would not die without Brutus' stab. Caesar realizes that there must be a noble reason for this assassination if Brutus was in it. This again shows how much Caesar respects Brutus. Brutus and Caesar both respect each other, but in different ways.(http://www.pei- asia.com/history/ROMAN/BRUTUS/BRUTUS.HT) Marcus Brutus had a very important role in the conspiracy against Caesar. He was the back-bone of the plan. According to Cassius, Brutus' main purpose in the conspiracy is for an insurance policy.(Bowers, 38-42) The people will think, since Brutus is noble to Caesar, that there is a good reason for Caesar's assassination. Brutus will also be the leader of the conspiracy for another insurance policy for the assassination.(47) Cassius is the one who declares this, Brutus shall lead the way, and we will grace his heels with the most boldest and best hearts of Rome. (Shakespeare, act 3, scene 1, 135-136). Again, if Brutus leads the way, the people will think that the death of Julius Caesar wasn't such a bad thing. Brutus also declares to himself that his role in the conspiracy is to save Rome. He says to the people that, If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.(Act 3,scene 2, 21-24). If Brutus was not in the plot Fite 4 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the conspiracy would probably not have worked.(Bowers, 53) Since Brutus ...loved Rome more.(Shakespeare, Act 3,scene2, 23-24), he decided to be a part of he conspiracy. If he hadn't loved Rome more than Caesar, he would not have joined in the assassination of Julius Caesar. Cassius and the rest of the conspirators would probably not have continued on without Brutus because they would have no insurance afterwards. The people would think that there was no reason for Caesar's death and most likely